Dispute file
The pedestal that was not there
A claims company came after us over a gas line. Their position was that our bore struck it, and they had photos of the damage to prove it.
We pulled our own pictures from before we dug and after we finished. In their photos the damaged area appeared to intersect a pedestal. That pedestal did not exist when we bored, which means there is no way our bore path crossed what they were pointing at.
Then the location fell apart as well. Their photos had been taken roughly 200 feet south of where they originally claimed the damage was.
We took our images, drew on them, and built the report inside the same platform, putting their claim next to ours. This is what you are claiming. This is what we see. This is what we see wrong with your claim. Do you have any more information. We submit reports like that all the time, and a lot of these claims companies are just looking for easy money.
Before we started implementing photos, there was no way for us to prove anything. We were not near a water main, we excavated properly, and a year later a bill showed up for $8,000 over a small hole we did not make. A main leaking for a year would have been catastrophic, and we still could not disprove it.